Is my portfolio too dependent on one macro outcome?

To answer that I’ll show how concentrated your portfolio is across holdings, sectors, regions and asset classes so you can see which single macro outcome would matter most.

Item	Share (%)
Top holding — Apple Inc.	18,41%
Top 5 holdings (combined)	65,64%
Stocks (asset class) — Stock	49,09%
ETFs (asset class) — ETF	31,21%
Crypto (asset class) — Crypto	8,61%
Cash — Cash	6,06%
Precious metal — Precious metal	5,03%
Technology sector — Technology	39,98%
United States (country) — United States	62,45%
North America (region) — North America	63,12%
Mega Cap (market cap) — Mega Cap	53,50%

What this means

• A single macro outcome that strongly affects US mega-cap technology (for example: US growth surprise, tech regulation, or a major interest-rate shock) would influence a large part of your portfolio because Technology is 39,98% and US exposure is 62,45%, with Mega Cap at 53,50%.
• Your largest single holding is Apple Inc. at 18,41% and the top 5 add up to 65,64%, so company- or sector-specific macro shocks could have outsized effects.
• Crypto is a distinct exposure at 8,61% and has high volatility contribution in your risk profile, so crypto-specific macro moves (regulation, sentiment) matter separately.

Notes and coverage

• Country coverage is 99,40%% and sector coverage is 99,95%%, so the breakdown reflects nearly all holdings.
• The holdings-by-volatility-contribution view shows which positions drive portfolio volatility most (Apple, Microsoft, Lufthansa, ETFs and crypto are top contributors).

If you want, I can show a short scenario that applies specific shocks (e.g. US tech -30%, crypto -40%) and compute the hypothetical portfolio impact with assumptions.